To critically examine ethical issues in qualitative research. The ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice are guides for researchers to address initial and ongoing tensions between the needs and goals of the research and the rights of participants. Research literature, ethics literature, and researcher experiences. Ethical principles can be used to guide the research in addressing the initial and ongoing issues arising from qualitative research in order to meet the goals of the research as well as to maintain the rights of the research participants.

ResearchGate Logo

Discover the world's research

  • 20+ million members
  • 135+ million publications
  • 700k+ research projects

Join for free

Journal of Nursing Scholarship First Quarter 2001 93

Profession and Society

Ethical issues are present in any kind of research. The

research process creates tension between the aims of

research to make generalizations for the good of

others, and the rights of participants to maintain privacy.

Ethics pertains to doing good and avoiding harm. Harm can

be prevented or reduced through the application of

appropriate ethical principles. Thus, the protection of human

subjects or participants in any research study is imperative.

Violations of human rights in the name of scientific research

have been among the darkest events in history. From 1932-

1972 more than 400 African American people who had

syphilis were deliberately left untreated to study the illness.

Although the Tuskegee syphilis study was sponsored by

United States Public Health Service, the disclosure of the 40-

year study caused public outrage (Caplan, 1992). Another

example of unethical research is the experiment conducted

between 1950-1952 in which more than 1,000 pregnant

women were given diethylstilbestrol to prevent miscarriages.

These women were subject to a double-blind study without

consent. Only 20 years later, when the children of these

women had high rates of cancer and other abnormalities did

the participants learn they were subjects of these experiments

(Capron, 1989).

The nature of ethical problems in qualitative research

studies is subtle and different compared to problems in

quantitative research. For example, potential ethical conflicts

exist in regard to how a researcher gains access to a

community group and in the effects the researcher may have

on participants. The literature provides few examples of

ethical issues in qualitative health research. Punch (1994)

claimed that one hardly ever hears of ethical failures in

qualitative research. However, Batchelor and Briggs (1994)

claimed that the failure of researchers to address ethical issues

has resulted in those researchers being ill-prepared to cope

with the unpredictable nature of qualitative research.

Qualitative researchers focus their research on exploring,

examining, and describing people and their natural

environments. Embedded in qualitative research are the

concepts of relationships and power between researchers and

participants. The desire to participate in a research study

depends upon a participant's willingness to share his or her

experience. Nurse researchers have to balance research

principles as well as the well-being of clients (Ramos, 1989).

Qualitative health research is focused on the experiences

of people in relation to health and illness. Yet nurse

researchers may find that their roles as researchers and as

clinicians may be in conflict. Qualitative studies are frequently

conducted in settings involving the participation of people

in their everyday environments. Therefore, any research that

includes people requires an awareness of the ethical issues

that may be derived from such interactions. Ethics in health

research includes appropriateness of the research design, the

methodological design, and the funding sources, as well as

behaviors in reporting data. The purpose of this paper is to

show these and related ethical issues and ethical principles

to be used in qualitative research.

Ethics in Qualitative Research

Angelica Orb, Laurel Eisenhauer, Dianne Wynaden

Angelica Orb, RN, PhD, MACE,

Alpha Chi

, Senior Lecturer, School of Nursing,

Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia. Laurel Eisenhauer,

RN, PhD, FAAN,

Alpha Chi

, Professor and Associate Dean for Graduate Programs,

School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA. Dianne Wynaden, RN,

RMHN, MSc (HSc), Lecturer, School of Nursing, Curtin University of Technology,

Perth, Western Australia, and Clinical Nurse Consultant, Directorate of Mental

Health Services, Fremantle Hospital and Health Service, Fremantle, Western

Australia. Correspondence to Dr. Orb, School of Nursing, Curtin University of

Technology, GPO Box 1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845. E-mail:

orba@nursing.curtin.edu.au

Accepted for publication June 12, 2000.

Purpose: To critically examine ethical issues in qualitative research.

Organizing Construct: The ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice are guides

for researchers to address initial and ongoing tensions between the needs and goals of the

research and the rights of participants.

Methods: Research literature, ethics literature, and researcher experiences.

Conclusions: Ethical principles can be used to guide the research in addressing the initial and

ongoing issues arising from qualitative research in order to meet the goals of the research as

well as to maintain the rights of the research participants.

JOURNAL OF N URSING S CHOLARSHIP , 2000; 33:1, 93-96. ©2001 SIGMA T HETA T AU I NTERNATIONAL.

[Key words: qualitative research, ethics]

* * *

94 First Quarter 2001 Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Ethics in Qualitative Research

Issues in Qualitative Research

Although ethical review boards scrutinize most nursing

research proposals, the researchers are ultimately responsible

for protecting the participants. Dresser (1998) said that the

administrative burden of ethical reviews and procedures is

balanced by the protection of participants. She suggested close

monitoring of high-risk studies. In qualitative studies,

researchers rely heavily on collecting data through interviews,

observations, written materials, and audiovisual material.

While in the field, researchers should negotiate access to

participants to collect data; thus the quality of social

interactions between researchers and the participants may

facilitate or inhibit access to information. Once access to the

field has been granted and the first steps of data collection

are taken, researchers may experience ethical dilemmas that

may not have been anticipated in the research plan (Field &

Morse, 1992).

Ramos (1989) described three types of problems that may

affect qualitative studies: the researcher/participant

relationship, the researcher's subjective interpretations of

data, and the design itself. For example, a researcher's

deception or disclosure of damaging information can occur.

Humphrey's study of homosexuals is one example (Punch,

1994). His controversial research method of participant

observation using deception shocked American academics

who wanted to revoke the researcher's doctoral degree. He

observed men in a public bathroom and followed them to

their homes under the guise of working on a different project

(Punch, 1994). Clarke (1996) used deception in a forensic

unit, claiming that this approach was necessary to obtain

"uncontaminated" data. She used participant observation

over a period of 6 weeks while working as a nursing auxiliary.

Clarke did not disclose her role as researcher. She retreated

to the restroom to take notes or to speak into a small

dictaphone. Clarke justified this method stating that some

degree of deception is permissible when "dealing with

sensitive aspects of subjects' behaviour" (p. 38).

When preparing research protocols, nurse researchers

should consider the potential ethical issues that can be

anticipated in the study, such as informed consent,

confidentiality, data generation and analysis, researcher/

participant relationships, and reporting of final outcomes.

The Process of Data Collection

The purpose of qualitative studies is to describe a

phenomenon from the participants' points of view through

interviews and observations. The intention of the researcher

is to listen to the voice of participants or observe them in

their natural environments. The researcher's interpretation

of these experiences is usually described as an emic perspective

(Field & Morse, 1992). The acceptance of this statement

means that researchers recognise that participants are

autonomous people who will share information willingly. A

balanced research relationship will encourage disclosure,

trust, and awareness of potential ethical issues. Kvale (1996)

considered an interview to be a moral endeavour, claiming

that the participant's response is affected by the interview,

and that the knowledge gained through the interview affects

our understanding of the human experience. The personal

interaction between researchers and participants is crucial

in data gathering by keeping in mind the research focus and

being clear about the role of researchers. The researchers'

perceptions of field situations are determined by personality

and the nature of the interactions (Punch, 1994).

Although qualitative research methods make it difficult to

predict how data will be collected through interviews or

observation (Streubert & Carpenter, 1999), researchers have

the obligation to anticipate the possible outcomes of an

interview and to weigh both benefits and potential harm.

For example, in the case of interviewing victims of violence,

the interview may trigger painful experiences and the

participant may become distressed during the interview. In

this case, the researcher is confronted with an ethical

dilemma—to continue with the interview and gain more

insight about the topic under study or to stop the interview

and give advice or refer the participant to an appropriate

treatment or counseling service. Deciding to continue would

indicate that the researcher considers that the value of the

data obtained from the distressing experience outweighs the

participant's distress. Smith (1999) wrote about the potential

therapeutic benefits of participants' reviving unpleasant

memories and also the importance of seeking ongoing

consent. Hutchinson, Wilson, and Wilson (1994) identified

the benefits of qualitative interviews as catharsis, self-

acknowledgment, sense of purpose, self-awareness,

empowerment, healing, and providing a voice for the

disenfranchised. Stopping the interview and searching for

possible solutions for the participants' distress indicates that

researchers are aware of the vulnerability of participants and

their rights. The moral obligation of researchers is to refer

participants to counseling or ensure that they have regained

control of the situation by talking. In some cases, a follow-

up phone call or visit may be appropriate.

Ethical dilemmas that may rise from an interview are

difficult to predict but the researcher needs to be aware of

sensitive issues and potential conflicts of interest. An interview

is usually equated with confidentiality, informed consent, and

privacy, but also by recurrence of "old wounds" and sharing

of secrets. The interview opens new risks to both researchers

and participants. Researchers may be required by law to

report information about child or elder abuse, drug traffic,

or crimes. Courts for domestic and criminal proceedings may

subpoena researchers' records. In some studies in the US,

researchers may wish to consider obtaining a Certificate of

Confidentiality from the Department of Health and Human

Services (Lutz, Shelton, Robrecht, Hatton, & Beckett, 2000).

The following example is one of those ethical dilemmas

that are silent in qualitative health research literature. During

an interview, a participant revealed to a graduate student

doing the interview that she was involved in drug dealings;

the student was advised by one of the supervisors to delete

such interviews. A year later the participant's spouse was

dead from drug abuse. Researchers who are doing qualitative

Journal of Nursing Scholarship First Quarter 2001 95

Ethics in Qualitative Research

health research must be aware not only of the promise to

maintain confidentiality but to search vigorously for ways

to deal with the ethical and legal issues they may encounter.

Ethical codes and guidelines for research projects do not

have answers to all of the ethical issues that may arise during

research. Subsequently, ethical dilemmas that are not part of

the study may arise (Field & Morse, 1992) during an

observation in a clinical area. A novice researcher observed the

following event. An elderly woman asked to be taken to the

toilet; a nursing staff member said that was not a convenient

time and moved along to the next patient. In this situation the

researcher is witnessing an unethical behaviour. In this case,

Codes of Ethics indicate the rights of patients but do not indicate

to the researcher how to respond to this situation. Such

situations require careful examination of the moral

responsibility of researchers. For example, based on his past

experience, Patton (1990) recommended full disclosure of the

purpose of the study when doing participant observation. He

claimed that false or partial explanations are too risky and add

unnecessary stress. Qualitative researchers are expected to

describe the research experience in an authentic manner, often

contrary to their own aims (Munhall, 1988). The research

protocol also should provide enough information ensuring

protection of human subjects. Moreover, such protocols must

give details of the manner in which the study will be conducted,

followed by details of access to participants, informed consent,

and access and storage of data.

Ethical Principles

The difficulties inherent in qualitative research can be

alleviated by awareness and use of well-established ethical

principles, specifically autonomy, beneficence, and justice.

Autonomy

Several authors have claimed that the protection of human

rights is a mandate in health care research (Dresser, 1998;

Kvale, 1996; Munhall, 1988; Raudonis, 1992). Capron

(1989) said that any kind of research should be guided by

the principles of respect for people, beneficence, and justice.

He considered that respect for people is the recognition of

participants' rights, including the right to be informed about

the study, the right to freely decide whether to participate in

a study, and the right to withdraw at any time without penalty.

In a qualitative research study this principle is honored by

informed consent, which means making a reasonable balance

between over-informing and under-informing (Kvale, 1996).

It also means that participants exercise their rights as

autonomous persons to voluntarily accept or refuse to

participate in the study. Consent has been referred to as a

negotiation of trust, and it requires continuous renegotiation

(Field & Morse, 1992; Kvale, 1996; Munhall, 1988).

Informed consent is dynamic, for example, in studying

responses of family caregivers to caring for chronic patients,

determining who needs to give informed consent may be

necessary. For example, it may pertain only to caregivers or

consent from patients or other family members may also be

required.

Beneficence

A second ethical principle closely linked with research is

beneficence—doing good for others and preventing harm.

Beneficence in some situations may be taken to the extreme as

paternalism. A paternalistic approach indicates the denial of

autonomy and freedom of choice. For example, the researcher

may want to study the problem of violence among elderly

women but may decide not to include them because they may

be too vulnerable. In this case, the researcher is not giving elderly

women the opportunity to decide for themselves and for their

experiences to be heard.

Research strategies used to collect data and selection criteria

also have ethical implications. For example, Raudonis (1992)

indicated that considerable thought was given to inclusion

criteria during the recruitment of potential participants for a

nursing study of hospice patients' perspectives of empathy.

Those patients who were unable to give consent or unable to

participate in open-ended interviews were not asked to

participate.

If researchers are maintaining the principle of beneficence,

overseeing the potential consequences of revealing participants'

identities is a moral obligation. The use of pseudonyms is

recommended. However, this strategy may not be sufficient if

the study is conducted in a small community where participants

could be easily recognised. In such cases, circulation of the

study may need to be restricted, for instance, reports of a study

conducted with a group of Aboriginal nursing students may be

restricted until the participants graduate from the nursing

program. Such a group is small and can be easily recognised by

the nursing community. Protection of participants' identities

also applies to publications. Participants should be told how

results will be published. Quotations or other data from the

participants, even though anonymous, could reveal their

identity. Ideally, participants would approve the use of

quotations used in publications.

Confidentiality and anonymity can be breached by legal

requirements such as when researchers' data are subpoenaed

for legal purposes. If legal reporting is required, such as cases

of child or elder abuse, participants should be informed that

this information would be excluded from confidentiality and

anonymity. Despite the need for confidentiality, qualitative

research requires confirmability, that is, documentation of all

activities included in a research study. This audit trail is there

for other researchers to follow (Streubert & Carpenter, 1999).

This process may create an ethical dilemma regarding

confidentiality and anonymity. In some cases, participants may

need to know that other researchers may review the process

and the data.

Justice

The principle of justice refers to equal share and fairness.

One of the crucial and distinctive features of this principle is

avoiding exploitation and abuse of participants. The

researcher's understanding and application of the principle of

96 First Quarter 2001 Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Ethics in Qualitative Research

justice in qualitative research studies is demonstrated by

recognising vulnerability of the participants and their

contributions to the study. For example, if researchers during

analysis of the data consider that a concept or a heading of the

report will be based on the contribution of a particular

participant, ethically the researcher should request permission

to use such a concept or at least discuss the issues with the

participant. In this way, the contributions of that participant

are acknowledged. Another way of implementing the principle

of justice is listening to the voices of the minority and

disadvantaged groups as well as protecting those who are most

vulnerable, such as children, prisoners, the mentally ill, and

the elderly.

Capron (1989) said that practical problems arise when

researchers try to implement the principle of justice. For

instance, the implementation of the principle of justice should

not further burden the already burdened vulnerable group of

participants. An example was the situation in which the consent

forms for a group of Ethiopians for a rabies vaccine trial were

not translated to the local language (News in Brief, 1999). A

similar case also was reported in a malaria project with children

from Zambia and Malawi, in which parents were not informed

about the experimental nature of the trial. Unfortunately in

these cases, like in many others (Capron, 1989), the participants

were among the most powerless people in society.

Implications for Researchers

Having these ethical principles in mind, those researchers

who are also clinicians should reflect on their roles as researchers

and in comparison to their previous roles as clinicians. At times,

however, researchers have to revert rapidly to their roles as

clinicians. The separation of these two roles is not easy.

Clinicians usually advise and treat clients for their complaints.

Clinicians, in this new role of researchers, should listen to

participants about what they want to say or to observe without

interfering. For someone who has been used to being in charge

or helping, this apparent passivity may cause discomfort and

some level of stress.

Moreover, conducting qualitative research in an area in which

the researcher works or is already known raises several issues

and ethical considerations. The clinician/researcher may get

better results because of knowing the situation and having the

trust of participants. However, the known researcher may get

less information. Patients and staff may feel coerced to

participate and may limit the information they give. According

to Field and Morse (1992) conducting research in one's work

area creates problems related to the validity, reliability, and

meaningfulness of the data. Conducting research in another

setting may mean that researchers have to spend more time

and effort establishing rapport and learning the new setting.

But, this change may result in more objective observations.

Negotiation of the researcher's role on a clinical unit is

important. If the role of the researcher is clearly identified

by the group and the purposes of the study are discussed, the

researcher will be regarded as such and not as someone who

is doing something dubious. It also will reduce the group's

false expectations. Perceiving the researcher as another pair

of hands who can be used during busy periods is an attractive

idea. The negotiation of the role will also promote a clear

understanding of the researcher's role during data collection.

Gaining the trust of the group and their willingness to support

the researcher's role is a step in the right direction, but it is

the recognition of the relevance of ethical principles that must

guide any research study.

Conclusions

In this paper, we have examined the common ethical

concerns that qualitative health researchers confront and have

highlighted the ethical principles that can guide research and

researchers. These principles cannot ensure ethical research

but they can contribute to an understanding that ethical

responsibility in qualitative research is an ongoing process.

Qualitative researchers should report the incidents and ethical

issues encountered in their studies to ensure discussion,

analysis, and prevention of future mistakes. Nurse researchers

must always respect the mandate of maintaining ethical

principles as an issue of protection of human rights, important

in both patient care and research.

References

Batchelor, J.A., & Briggs, C.M. (1994). Subject, project or self? Thoughts

on ethical dilemmas for social and medical researchers. Social Science &

Medicine, 39(7), 949-954.

Caplan, A.L. (1992). Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee syphilis

study. Hastings Center Report, 22(6), 29.

Capron, A.M. (1989). Human experimentation. In R.M. Veatch (Ed.),

Medical ethics (125-172). Boston: Jones & Bartlett.

Clarke, L. (1996). Covert participant observation in a secure forensic unit.

Nursing Times, 92(48), 37-40.

Dresser, R. (1998). Time for new rules on human subjects research? Hastings

Center Report, 28(6), 23-24.

Field, P.A., & Morse, J.M. (1992). Nursing research. The application of

qualitative approaches. London: Chapman & Hall.

Hutchinson, S.A., Wilson, M.E., & Wilson, H.S. (1994). Benefits of

participating in research interviews. Image: Journal of Nursing

Scholarship, 26, 161-164.

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research

interviewing. CA: Sage.

Lutz,K.F., Shelton, K.C., Robrecht, L.C. , Hatton, D.C., & Beckett, A.K.

(2000). Use of certificates of confidentiality in nursing research. Journal

of Nursing Scholarship, 32, 185-188.

Munhall, P. (1988). Ethical considerations in qualitative research. Western

Journal of Nursing Research, 10(2), 150-162.

News in brief. (1999). Monash Bioethics Review, 18(1), 3-8.

Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd

ed). Newbery Park, CA: Sage.

Punch, M. (1994). Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin

& Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Newbery Park,

CA: Sage.

Ramos, M.C. (1989). Some ethical implications of qualitative research.

Research in Nursing & Health, 12, 57-63.

Raudonis, B.M. (1992). Ethical considerations in qualitative research with

hospice patients. Qualitative Health Research, 2(2), 238-249.

Smith, B.A. (1999). Ethical and methodological benefits of using a reflexive

journal in hermeneutic-phenomenological research. Image: Journal of

Nursing Scholarship, 31, 359-363.

Streubert, H.J., & Carpenter, D.R. (Eds.). (1999). Qualitative research in

nursing. Advancing the humanistic imperative (2nd ed.). Philadelphia:

Lippincott.

JNS

... They questioned the confidentiality protocol in a confident, dignified and steadfast manner. Orb et al. (2001) recognise that a paternalistic approach in implementing confidentiality may be necessary to prevent harm in extreme cases of vulnerability. For example, in nursing research, a researcher may decide to exclude older women's experiences in research on violence as they may be too vulnerable (Orb et al., 2001). ...

... Orb et al. (2001) recognise that a paternalistic approach in implementing confidentiality may be necessary to prevent harm in extreme cases of vulnerability. For example, in nursing research, a researcher may decide to exclude older women's experiences in research on violence as they may be too vulnerable (Orb et al., 2001). However, in my experience, the unilateral implementation of confidentiality does not seem beneficial to the participants precisely because the measure denies them the autonomy to make the decision (Giordano et al., 2007;Orb et al., 2001) and inadvertently gives power to the researcher (Giordano et al., 2007). ...

... For example, in nursing research, a researcher may decide to exclude older women's experiences in research on violence as they may be too vulnerable (Orb et al., 2001). However, in my experience, the unilateral implementation of confidentiality does not seem beneficial to the participants precisely because the measure denies them the autonomy to make the decision (Giordano et al., 2007;Orb et al., 2001) and inadvertently gives power to the researcher (Giordano et al., 2007). Lack of autonomy, mainly due to diminished decision-making capacity, engenders participant vulnerability (Bracken-Roche et al., 2017;Giordano et al., 2007). ...

Purpose This paper examines the ethical tensions in social entrepreneurship (SE) research by focusing on the ethical consequences of obtaining ethics approval in a university in the developed world while executing fieldwork for data collection in a developing country. It aims to offer insight into ethical research practice to protect vulnerable research participants from being further silenced and marginalised by the dominant social order that developed world universities embody. Design/methodology/approach The ethical tensions are described through narratives drawn from a Filipino Ph.D. candidate's experience. The candidate obtained ethics approval from the university in New Zealand and collected interview data from social enterprise beneficiaries in the Philippines. A critical reflexive lens carves a space for a deepened understanding of these ethical tensions. Findings This paper offers critical insights into ethical SE research involving participants from vulnerable communities. These insights suggest that closer consideration needs to be given to contextual sensitivity, particularly on the part of researchers and research ethics committees, in crafting ethical data collection protocols. Findings also show how it is important for the indigenous researcher to filter ethical protocols through their local knowledge. Originality/value The paper uses critical reflexivity to examine ethical tensions in SE research involving vulnerable beneficiaries. It offers insights into ethical research procedures and practices that engender mindfulness of the contextual and relational aspects of doing SE research in the developing world.

... The principal investigator collected data at his own work place. To ensure transparency, he made his role known to the participants as a researcher and not as a colleague (Orb et al., 2001). ...

  • Thompson Ericho Waiyon
  • Elisabeth Schuele Elisabeth Schuele

Adherence to anti-retroviral therapy (ART) is important for suppressing HIV and attaining health benefits. Through ART adherence, viral load is suppressed and the chances of HIV transmission are minimized. Retaining clients to ART adherence as a lifelong treatment remains a challenge. The provision of ART services is conditioned by health care workers working conditions and environment as they act as street level bureaucrats. This study investigated the perspectives of health care workers for good practice to ART adherence and changes to improve clients' ART adherence in Western Highlands Province (WHP), Papua New Guinea (PNG). Twelve face to face interviews and two focus group discussions were conducted with twelve health care workers from five HIV clinics. The purposive sample included nursing officers, community health workers and HIV counsellors. Qualitative analysis identified key factors impacting the adherence to ART of clients. As street level bureaucrats, health care workers have to deal with high workloads, limited number of staff and shortage of ART drugs, they create own policies to provide ART to clients. Health care workers recognize the pluralistic therapeutic culture of clients who cross borders by combining biomedicine with vernacular therapy. Other factors contributing to lower ART adherence include blaming clients and stigma and discrimination towards vulnerable population due to structural problems in health facilities. The study identified ways to improve service provision to sustain ART adherence of clients. These findings provide implications for strengthening the health system that includes investment in human resources for health and developing policies and implementing strategies to improve ART adherence of clients.

... The subject in this study is an English Department student named Meta (pseudonym). This study ensured anonymity and privacy (confidentiality) as part of ethical principles in qualitative research (Orb et al., 2001). ...

  • Puji Astuti Amalia
  • Aridah Aridah

This case study aims to explore how the personality traits of a good language learner contributed to her success in language learning. Using a case study design, this study involved one student who met the criteria of a good language learner who became a champion of English competitions. This study used the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test and semi-structured interviews to collect the data. The study showed that Meta's extrovert personality was described as talkative, confident, enthusiastic, and assertive. She understood a problem by talking about it and heard others' ideas in solving problems. As a sensing personality, she was objective and made decisions based on logic and facts to decide both sides. As a thinking person, she always worked with plans, and in making plans, she analyzed the pros and cons. She was objective and consistent in doing what she had planned. Her judging personality described how she dealt with their outer world. She had a decided lifestyle that had helped her achieve her goals in language learning by planning her language learning activities.

... Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim using artificial intelligence software (Otter.ai). Transcripts were checked for accuracy and edited accordingly by KW, and any information that could be used to identify a participant was removed [48]. Transcripts were not returned to participants. ...

Dietary guidelines are important nutrition policy reference standards that should be informed by the best available evidence. The types of evidence that are reviewed and the evidence review methods that are used have implications for evidence translation. The aim of this study was to explore perceived advantages, disadvantages, and practicalities associated with the synthesis and translation of evidence from nutrient-based, food-based, and dietary patterns research in dietary guideline development. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Twenty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with people involved in the development of the 2013 Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADGs). Transcripts were analysed thematically. To inform future ADGs, there was support for reviewing evidence on a range of dietary exposures (including dietary patterns, foods and food groups, nutrients and food components, and eating occasions) and health outcomes, as well as evidence on environmental sustainability and equity. At the evidence synthesis stage, practicalities associated with planning the evidence review and conducting original systematic reviews were discussed. At the evidence translation stage, practicalities associated with integrating the evidence and consulting stakeholders were described. To ensure that the best available evidence is translated into future ADGs, evidence review methods should be selected based on the exposures and outcomes of interest.

... The protection of the privacy and rights of the informants in any kind of research is imperative (Orb, Eisenhauer & Wynaden [68], 2001). According to Richards and Schwartz [69] (2002), in order to achieve the goals of qualitative research without violating the rights of the informants, the following areas should be given serious considerations: anonymity, confidentiality, and informed consent. ...

  • Jeanevieve G. Dana-Gica
  • Khamille Grace S. Añasco
  • Ariel San Jose Ariel San Jose

The Kapatid Mentor ME (KMME) Program of the Philippine Government was designed with the goal to help Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) scale up their business by weekly coaching and mentoring. It is claimed that it is a successful program because of the success stories of the graduates. However, there is still no published articles or researches that show the impact of the program to the graduates in Digos City. Thus, this study was conducted. The main objective of the study was to assess the impact of the KMME in the overall performance on the registered business(s) of the 2017 graduates in Digos City. A qualitative evaluation research design was employed and a series of key informant interviews were conducted with the five participants chosen for the study. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and revealed that the program has a positive impact on both the personal improvement of the participants, and business performance has scaled up.

... Six in-depth interviews were conducted by the first author with siblings of persons with ID. Semi-structured interviews were used since this qualitative method allows participants to be involved in a more natural way and to collect their points of view in a more direct way than through self-repost methods (Orb, Eisenhauer, & Wynaden, 2001). ...

The relationships between siblings are the most long-lasting in families. When one of the siblings is a person with intellectual disabilities (ID), this relationship assumes an even more important role since this brother/sister will most likely become the disabled individual's main caregiver. This pilot study had two aims: to explore the experience as an adolescent or adult sibling of a person with ID and to understand the perceptions of these siblings about quality of life as a sibling and about family quality of life. In-depth interviews were conducted with six siblings. The results showed that the experience of a sibling is positive and the acceptance process is of extreme importance. The domains which, from the sibling perspective, contribute to family quality of life are as follows: Family relationships, Acceptance, Health, Influence of values, Financial well-being, Support from others, and Leisure activities. The implications of these findings for intervention are pointed out.

... Ethical issues are among the most important aspects that must be taken into another and include issues such as safety, the reason for investigation, deception, disclosure requirements for public data and obligations of the researcher to the participants, as well as the research agreement regarding how the data is going to be analysed and why or how it is to be used, reported and disseminated (Orb et al., 2000). Therefore, the guidelines of the research process ethics at Glasgow ...

  • Hashem Iswaissi Hashem Iswaissi

The thesis critically evaluates the corporate governance (CG) phenomenon in Libya as a case study, specifically in the Libyan banking sector (LBS), in order to investigate whether is it implemented or not. To achieve the research objectives, four sub-questions are studied under the main question, including which factors influence the actual implementation of CG and the level of compliance of Libyan Commercial Banks (LCBs) with the Libyan Corporate Governance Code (CGC) 2010 for banks, together with an investigation of factors that may hinder LCBs' efforts to adopt effective CG practices and an exploration of the strategies of the Central Bank of Libya (CBL) to overcome these issues. The research involved a qualitative approach through intensive fieldwork with in-depth interviews and documentation reviews in order to collect the required data, within the framework of agency, stakeholder and new institutional theories of CG. Six LCBs were selected as representative of the Libyan Banks, in addition to the CBL. The results of the findings reveal that the implementation of the CG Code 2010 in LCBs is still in the early stages. The weakness of supervision and absence of training, as well as lack of knowledge, are the main challenges to LCBs in complying with good CG practices. Furthermore, institutional factors have played a major negative role in hindering progress in complying effectively with the CGC, including political stability, together with legal and regulatory, social, and cultural factors. The political stability factor has an impact on both legal and regulatory aspects and on the CBL and their follow-up and supervision. The findings also reveal that there is an absence of the CG, audit, and risk management committees that represent important principles of CGC.

Purpose There has been a growing call regarding broad criteria for assessing qualitative methods' reliability and validity in international marketing (IM) research. In response, this study synthesizes the past literature to present an overarching, yet adaptable, trustworthiness verification framework for assessing the rigor of various qualitative methods used in IM. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on qualitative research from various disciplines. It uses content analysis to examine how trustworthiness is conceptualized in qualitative studies in International Marketing Review (IMR) from 2005 to 2019. Findings The analysis reveals that strategies to ensure rigor and trustworthiness of qualitative research in IMR are partially applied. There remain gaps in implementing quality criteria across the trustworthiness dimensions of credibility, transferability, dependability, conformability and ethics. Research limitations/implications This paper highlights the importance of incorporating strategies for assessing the quality of qualitative research in IM research. Since the analysis only focused on IMR, future research should explore and test the framework in other IM and business journals to reach a broader consensus in assessing qualitative studies' rigor. Originality/value IM researchers have yet to develop a consensus regarding broad criteria for assessing qualitative methods' reliability and validity. This paper is an attempt to fill this gap.

  • Kleinsy Bonilla Kleinsy Bonilla

This dissertation examines the provision of postgraduate scholarships by which selected donor countries have cooperated with Guatemala to develop capacity. The purpose of this study is to understand how this international cooperation scheme has been implemented, and to analyze the effectiveness of the support provided by donors. Drawing from capacity development and international education literature, this study proposes a framework to analyze the process and outcomes of this international cooperation approach from a holistic perspective, including a multi-sector viewpoint and a sequential timeline. This research presents a narrative account of the provision of scholarships offered by nine donor countries which have funded postgraduate academic programs (Master's or Doctoral degrees) for individuals from developing countries; these scholarships sponsor Guatemalans who wish to study at prestigious universities located within the donor's territory. Through the application of a qualitative methodology, this research reveals the actors, their roles, responsibilities and the dynamics of their participation.

  • Rachele Girardi

Almost 50 years after the Stonewall riots, queer liberation and police resistance are still inextricably intertwined. International hate crime statistics around the globe show increasingly high rates of LGBTQ+ victimization and criminalization by law enforcement. This qualitative research aims at evaluating whether queer theories of visibility and performativity could serve as useful tools to investigate the problematic dynamics between police and young queer individuals. For this purpose, online interviews were carried out with a sample of 20 young queer individuals from different European countries. Findings revealed that performing non-heteronormative bodies and behaviours is associated with being perceived as risky, dangerous and deviant. The correlation between queerness and deviance leads to a number of detrimental consequences, including police over-policing and criminalizing young LGBTQ+ individuals in public spaces, queer people underreporting hate crime incidents for fear of secondary victimization, and overall scepticism and mistrust towards the criminal justice system. Thus, this research not only affirms the importance of including queer voices in criminological research, but it also reveals the insidious nature of police violence against the LGBTQ+ community, which has long been neglected in queer studies.

  • Brian A. Smith RMN, MA, MSc
  • Brian A. Smith

To illustrate the importance of considering the researcher's written reflections on the qualitative research process as a valuable source of data and as a means of enhancing ethical and methodologic rigour. Excerpts from the researcher's reflexive journal are presented as evidence of an audit trail. Ethical and methodologic concerns arising during the research process are outlined and the value of reflecting on these issues is addressed. A hermeneutic-phenomenologic study, conducted in Scotland, included in-depth interviews with six problem drinkers to explore the lived experience of their suffering. The researcher was considered to be a primary data-collection tool, whose reflections on the research process added to the contextual richness of the study. For an interpretative approach to data analysis, the researcher found metaphors to convey the participants' stories to a new audience. This intuitive, creative process was analysed and reported in the reflexive journal. The researcher's self-awareness, fostered by the use of a reflexive journal, is mirrored by the participants' ability to reflect on the final interpretation of their stories and on the therapeutic benefits of the research process. The researcher's reflexive journal reveals previously hidden contextual information which enhances the prime ethical and methodologic aim of the study—to understand the lived experience of suffering by problem drinkers.

  • Mary Carol Ramos

Traditional values in nursing dictate a high level of concern for the welfare of research participants. Initial attempts at setting minimal ethical standards stemmed from the quantitative approaches. As qualitative modalities are more widely used, nurses must become acutely aware of possible problems in study design and planning, the dangers of coercion and deception, threats to confidentiality and trust, implications of the emergent design, and providing for a new concept of informed consent. The new character of the research relationship is examined in light of possible strategies for protection of research participants while preserving the integrity of qualitative investigation.